Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius, 1950
By: Allan, Donald J.
Title Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius
Type Article
Language English
Date 1950
Journal Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies
Volume 2
Pages 82–120
Categories no categories
Author(s) Allan, Donald J.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the authorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made their appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt to begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers concerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became known in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1013,"authors_free":[{"id":1529,"entry_id":1013,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":32,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Allan, Donald J.","free_first_name":"Donald J.","free_last_name":"Allan","norm_person":{"id":32,"first_name":"Donald J.","last_name":"Allan","full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1158470029","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"},"abstract":"The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the \r\nauthorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made \r\ntheir appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt \r\nto begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers \r\nconcerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became \r\nknown in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82]","btype":3,"date":"1950","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0PjZnKu9FMvQiNF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":32,"full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies","volume":"2","issue":"","pages":"82\u2013120"}},"sort":[1950]}

The Unity of Empedocles' Thought, 1949
By: Long, Herbert S.
Title The Unity of Empedocles' Thought
Type Article
Language English
Date 1949
Journal The American Journal of Philology
Volume 70
Issue 2
Pages 142-158
Categories no categories
Author(s) Long, Herbert S.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In this paper I shall first state the problem of the unity of Empedocles' thought, then consider two difficulties in the way of a solution and the effect that not observing them has had, and finally propose and attempt to justify what appears to me to be a reasonable explanation of the problem. [p. 142]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"731","_score":null,"_source":{"id":731,"authors_free":[{"id":1094,"entry_id":731,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":456,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Long, Herbert S.","free_first_name":"Herbert S.","free_last_name":"Long","norm_person":{"id":456,"first_name":"Herbert, S.","last_name":"Long","full_name":"Long, Herbert, S.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"The Unity of Empedocles' Thought","main_title":{"title":"The Unity of Empedocles' Thought"},"abstract":"In this paper I shall first \r\nstate the problem of the unity of Empedocles' thought, then \r\nconsider two difficulties in the way of a solution and the effect \r\nthat not observing them has had, and finally propose and attempt to justify what appears to me to be a reasonable explanation of \r\nthe problem. [p. 142]","btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/Glli8IC1bpJB9RU","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":456,"full_name":"Long, Herbert, S.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":731,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"70","issue":"2","pages":"142-158"}},"sort":[1949]}

Un vers méconnu des Oracles Chaldaïques dans Simplicius. In de Caelo II.1, 284a14 (p. 375. 9 ss. Heib), 1948
By: Festugière, André-Jean
Title Un vers méconnu des Oracles Chaldaïques dans Simplicius. In de Caelo II.1, 284a14 (p. 375. 9 ss. Heib)
Type Article
Language French
Date 1948
Journal Symbolae Osloenses
Volume 26
Pages 75–77
Categories no categories
Author(s) Festugière, André-Jean
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"549","_score":null,"_source":{"id":549,"authors_free":[{"id":773,"entry_id":549,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":112,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Festugi\u00e8re, Andr\u00e9-Jean","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9-Jean","free_last_name":"Festugi\u00e8re","norm_person":{"id":112,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9-Jean","last_name":"Festugi\u00e8re","full_name":"Festugi\u00e8re, Andr\u00e9-Jean","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/117758256","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Un vers m\u00e9connu des Oracles Chalda\u00efques dans Simplicius. In de Caelo II.1, 284a14 (p. 375. 9 ss. Heib)","main_title":{"title":"Un vers m\u00e9connu des Oracles Chalda\u00efques dans Simplicius. In de Caelo II.1, 284a14 (p. 375. 9 ss. Heib)"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1948","language":"French","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/dKy5vRHddyAHLV3","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":112,"full_name":"Festugi\u00e8re, Andr\u00e9-Jean","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":549,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":"26","issue":"","pages":"75\u201377"}},"sort":[1948]}

Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality, 1942
By: Fraenkel, Hermann
Title Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality
Type Article
Language English
Date 1942
Journal The American Journal of Philology
Volume 63
Issue 1
Pages 1-25
Categories no categories
Author(s) Fraenkel, Hermann
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In recent decades students of mathematics, philosophy, and the classics have again and again raised their voices 1 to vindicate the serious importance of Zeno's paradoxes of motion (Vorsokr.2 29 A 25-28 - Lee,3 nos. 19-36), not even excluding the Stadium. No longer can the problem implied in the paradoxes be disposed of by simply pointing out that time and space are equally divisible. The question which is at the bottom of all four of them is far more profound. [...] Fur- thermore, it has been shown that Aristotle, when qriticizing the paradoxes, was not concerned conscientiously to adjust his objec- tions to that which the historical Zeno had tried to prove, or rather disprove. [...] If it is thus established that Zeno's syllogisms must not necessarily be condemned as a futile play of dialectics 6 and that Aristotle's censure fails to do Zeno justice, a road seems to be open to a full rehabilitation and, perhaps, glorification. But one doubt remains. How adequately did the real Zeno actually deal with the problems he had in hand? And how sincere was he about them? [pp. 1 f.]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":1109,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":115,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","free_first_name":"Hermann","free_last_name":"Fraenkel","norm_person":{"id":115,"first_name":"Hermann","last_name":"Fraenkel","full_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119051478","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality","main_title":{"title":"Zeno of Elea's Attacks on Plurality"},"abstract":"In recent decades students of mathematics, philosophy, and \r\nthe classics have again and again raised their voices 1 to vindicate \r\nthe serious importance of Zeno's paradoxes of motion (Vorsokr.2 29 A 25-28 - Lee,3 nos. 19-36), not even excluding the Stadium. \r\nNo longer can the problem implied in the paradoxes be disposed of by simply pointing out that time and space are equally divisible. The question which is at the bottom of all four of \r\nthem is far more profound. [...] Fur- \r\nthermore, it has been shown that Aristotle, when qriticizing the \r\nparadoxes, was not concerned conscientiously to adjust his objec- tions to that which the historical Zeno had tried to prove, or \r\nrather disprove. [...] If it is \r\nthus established that Zeno's syllogisms must not necessarily be \r\ncondemned as a futile play of dialectics 6 and that Aristotle's \r\ncensure fails to do Zeno justice, a road seems to be open to a \r\nfull rehabilitation and, perhaps, glorification. But one doubt \r\nremains. How adequately did the real Zeno actually deal with \r\nthe problems he had in hand? And how sincere was he about \r\nthem? [pp. 1 f.]","btype":3,"date":"1942","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/thc7ngkOcyyG7Iz","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":115,"full_name":"Fraenkel, Hermann","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Journal of Philology","volume":"63","issue":"1","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":[1942]}

Neue Fragmente aus ΠΕΡΙ ΤΑΓΑΘΟΥ, 1941
By: Wilpert, Paul
Title Neue Fragmente aus ΠΕΡΙ ΤΑΓΑΘΟΥ
Type Article
Language German
Date 1941
Journal Hermes
Volume 76
Issue 3
Pages 225-250
Categories no categories
Author(s) Wilpert, Paul
Editor(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"426","_score":null,"_source":{"id":426,"authors_free":[{"id":572,"entry_id":426,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":362,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wilpert, Paul","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Wilpert","norm_person":{"id":362,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Wilpert","full_name":"Wilpert, Paul","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11739629X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Neue Fragmente aus \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399 \u03a4\u0391\u0393\u0391\u0398\u039f\u03a5","main_title":{"title":"Neue Fragmente aus \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399 \u03a4\u0391\u0393\u0391\u0398\u039f\u03a5"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1941","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/dKvVqb4uOVur2ah","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":362,"full_name":"Wilpert, Paul","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":426,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hermes","volume":"76","issue":"3","pages":"225-250"}},"sort":[1941]}

Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9, 1939
By: Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Title Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9
Type Article
Language English
Date 1939
Journal The Classical Quarterly
Volume 33
Issue 1
Pages 34-35
Categories no categories
Author(s) Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In this passage from Aristotle's De Caelo, he explores why the heavens revolve in one direction rather than the other. He suggests that the universe has a front and a back, which implies a forward motion that is superior to backward motion, just as upward and rightward motions are superior to their respective opposites. Aristotle argues that since nature always follows the best course, the direction of the heaven's revolution must be forward and therefore better. The text is difficult to understand due to possible corruptions, but a comparison with Simplicius' paraphrase suggests that both the subject and object of the main verb are missing and need to be restored. [introduction/conclusion]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1281","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1281,"authors_free":[{"id":1870,"entry_id":1281,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9"},"abstract":"In this passage from Aristotle's De Caelo, he explores why the heavens revolve in one direction rather than the other. He suggests that the universe has a front and a back, which implies a forward motion that is superior to backward motion, just as upward and rightward motions are superior to their respective opposites. Aristotle argues that since nature always follows the best course, the direction of the heaven's revolution must be forward and therefore better. The text is difficult to understand due to possible corruptions, but a comparison with Simplicius' paraphrase suggests that both the subject and object of the main verb are missing and need to be restored. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1939","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/NfJMuZWhRJUPSCS","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1281,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"33","issue":"1","pages":"34-35"}},"sort":[1939]}

Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS⁵ 12 B 1), 1938
By: Dirlmeier, Franz
Title Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS⁵ 12 B 1)
Type Article
Language German
Date 1938
Journal Rheinisches Museum für Philologie
Volume 87
Issue 4
Pages 376-382
Categories no categories
Author(s) Dirlmeier, Franz
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Die Weltsicht der Ionier wird zu einer Zeit, als sie schon der Geschichte angehörte, neu geformt durch die Wissenschaft- ler der aristotelischen Schule, die somit die uranfängliche Scheu vor dem Unbestimmten, Unbegrenzten treu bewahren. Aber sie dehnen sie auch noch aus auf fast alle Bereiche des Seins. Frühionische Bändigung des Chaos der -feveffeic in irepioboi vollzieht sich aufs neue, wenn etwa Aristoteles den ungeord- neten, den nur „gereihten46 Ablauf der Menschenrede „unter- wirft", mit der Begründung: die XéHiç elpojiévTi sei ein àr'bkç olà tò ÔTreipov tò fàp TéXoç iravreç ßouXovrai K0t6opâv (Rhet. y 9, 1409 a31). Wenn wir zu den Erkenntnissen der schöpferischen Jahrhunderte VI bis III die sorgsame Auseinandersetzung des Simplikios nehmen, der am Ausgang der Antike mit fester Hand das gültig Gedachte noch einmal zusammenfaßt, so haben wir damit ein Jahrtausend hellenischen Geistes überblickt. [p. 382]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":757,"authors_free":[{"id":1122,"entry_id":757,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":63,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","free_first_name":"Franz","free_last_name":"Dirlmeier","norm_person":{"id":63,"first_name":"Franz ","last_name":"Dirlmeier","full_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140255591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS\u2075 12 B 1)","main_title":{"title":"Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS\u2075 12 B 1)"},"abstract":"Die Weltsicht der Ionier wird zu einer Zeit, als sie schon \r\nder Geschichte angeh\u00f6rte, neu geformt durch die Wissenschaft- \r\nler der aristotelischen Schule, die somit die uranf\u00e4ngliche Scheu \r\nvor dem Unbestimmten, Unbegrenzten treu bewahren. Aber \r\nsie dehnen sie auch noch aus auf fast alle Bereiche des Seins. \r\nFr\u00fchionische B\u00e4ndigung des Chaos der -feveffeic in irepioboi \r\nvollzieht sich aufs neue, wenn etwa Aristoteles den ungeord- \r\nneten, den nur \u201egereihten46 Ablauf der Menschenrede \u201eunter- \r\nwirft\", mit der Begr\u00fcndung: die X\u00e9Hi\u00e7 elpoji\u00e9vTi sei ein \u00e0r'bk\u00e7 ol\u00e0 \r\nt\u00f2 \u00d4Treipov t\u00f2 f\u00e0p T\u00e9Xo\u00e7 iravre\u00e7 \u00dfouXovrai K0t6op\u00e2v (Rhet. y 9, \r\n1409 a31). Wenn wir zu den Erkenntnissen der sch\u00f6pferischen \r\nJahrhunderte VI bis III die sorgsame Auseinandersetzung des \r\nSimplikios nehmen, der am Ausgang der Antike mit fester Hand \r\ndas g\u00fcltig Gedachte noch einmal zusammenfa\u00dft, so haben \r\nwir damit ein Jahrtausend hellenischen Geistes \u00fcberblickt. [p. 382]","btype":3,"date":"1938","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GvW8g50PoxkFsCo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":63,"full_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie","volume":"87","issue":"4","pages":"376-382"}},"sort":[1938]}

Indivisible Lines, 1936
By: Nicol, A. T.
Title Indivisible Lines
Type Article
Language English
Date 1936
Journal The Classical Quarterly
Volume 30
Issue 2
Pages 120-126
Categories no categories
Author(s) Nicol, A. T.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The name of Democritus can claim a place in any discussion of indivisibles. Yet its introduction in this paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle ; for Democritus did not believe in the existence of indivisible lines. Nowhere is the belief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the scholion on De Caelo 268a x, which says he made his elements indivisible solids, as contrasted with lines or surfaces. Two passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will show why he could not believe in indivisible lines. [p. 120]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"866","_score":null,"_source":{"id":866,"authors_free":[{"id":1270,"entry_id":866,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":278,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nicol, A. T.","free_first_name":"A. T.","free_last_name":"Nicol","norm_person":{"id":278,"first_name":"Nicol","last_name":"A. T.","full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Indivisible Lines","main_title":{"title":"Indivisible Lines"},"abstract":"The name of Democritus can claim a place in any discussion of indivisibles. \r\nYet its introduction in this paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle ; \r\nfor Democritus did not believe in the existence of indivisible lines. Nowhere is the \r\nbelief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the scholion on \r\nDe Caelo 268a x, which says he made his elements indivisible solids, as contrasted \r\nwith lines or surfaces. Two passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will show why he could not believe in indivisible lines. [p. 120]","btype":3,"date":"1936","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/j7CSmqxKwIBye6i","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":278,"full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":866,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"30","issue":"2","pages":"120-126"}},"sort":[1936]}

A New Fragment of Parmenides, 1935
By: Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Title A New Fragment of Parmenides
Type Article
Language English
Date 1935
Journal The Classical Review
Volume 49
Issue 4
Pages 122-123
Categories no categories
Author(s) Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The text discusses a disputed line in Parmenides, quoted in Plato's Theaetetus and Simplicius' Physics. Some editors deny the line's independent existence, claiming it was created by Plato by misquoting another verse. The author disagrees with this view, arguing that the line is meaningful and could have been in their texts of Parmenides. The author also argues that there is no reason to believe that Simplicius took the line from Plato, and that Plato was not slovenly in his treatment of Parmenides. The author proposes a corrected version of the line and suggests that it may be Parmenides' last word on the unity and unchangeableness of Being. [introduction/conclusion]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1280","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1280,"authors_free":[{"id":1869,"entry_id":1280,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides","main_title":{"title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides"},"abstract":"The text discusses a disputed line in Parmenides, quoted in Plato's Theaetetus and Simplicius' Physics. Some editors deny the line's independent existence, claiming it was created by Plato by misquoting another verse. The author disagrees with this view, arguing that the line is meaningful and could have been in their texts of Parmenides. The author also argues that there is no reason to believe that Simplicius took the line from Plato, and that Plato was not slovenly in his treatment of Parmenides. The author proposes a corrected version of the line and suggests that it may be Parmenides' last word on the unity and unchangeableness of Being. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/22AiAGR3zgXhXHY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1280,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"49","issue":"4","pages":"122-123"}},"sort":[1935]}

Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios, 1935
By: Merlan, Philipp
Title Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios
Type Article
Language German
Date 1935
Journal Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Neue Folge
Volume 84
Issue 2
Pages 154-160
Categories no categories
Author(s) Merlan, Philipp
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In diesem Text geht es um Simplikios' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' De caelo II, 1, 284 a 14 ff. und Pseudo-Alexandros' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' Metaphysik A, 8, 1074aff. Beide diskutieren Fragen zur Bewegung des Himmels und stellen ähnliche Gedanken zum Verhältnis von Seele und Bewegung dar. Der Text betrachtet die Möglichkeit, dass Simplikios und Pseudo-Alexandros einander zitiert haben oder dass sie beide den echten Alexandros zitieren. Es wird auch auf die Interpretation von Aristoteles' De caelo H, 1,284a 27 ff. durch Simplikios eingegangen. [whole text]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1209","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1209,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1209,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":258,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Merlan, Philipp","free_first_name":"Philipp","free_last_name":"Merlan","norm_person":{"id":258,"first_name":"Philip","last_name":"Merlan","full_name":"Merlan, Philip","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/128860502","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios"},"abstract":"In diesem Text geht es um Simplikios' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' De caelo II, 1, 284 a 14 ff. und Pseudo-Alexandros' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' Metaphysik A, 8, 1074aff. Beide diskutieren Fragen zur Bewegung des Himmels und stellen \u00e4hnliche Gedanken zum Verh\u00e4ltnis von Seele und Bewegung dar. Der Text betrachtet die M\u00f6glichkeit, dass Simplikios und Pseudo-Alexandros einander zitiert haben oder dass sie beide den echten Alexandros zitieren. Es wird auch auf die Interpretation von Aristoteles' De caelo H, 1,284a 27 ff. durch Simplikios eingegangen. [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/7lVxYR3sHQ2Ie0a","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":258,"full_name":"Merlan, Philip","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1209,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie. Neue Folge","volume":"84","issue":"2","pages":"154-160"}},"sort":[1935]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 3
A New Fragment of Parmenides, 1935
By: Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Title A New Fragment of Parmenides
Type Article
Language English
Date 1935
Journal The Classical Review
Volume 49
Issue 4
Pages 122-123
Categories no categories
Author(s) Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The text discusses a disputed line in Parmenides, quoted in Plato's Theaetetus and Simplicius' Physics. Some editors deny the line's independent existence, claiming it was created by Plato by misquoting another verse. The author disagrees with this view, arguing that the line is meaningful and could have been in their texts of Parmenides. The author also argues that there is no reason to believe that Simplicius took the line from Plato, and that Plato was not slovenly in his treatment of Parmenides. The author proposes a corrected version of the line and suggests that it may be Parmenides' last word on the unity and unchangeableness of Being. [introduction/conclusion]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1280","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1280,"authors_free":[{"id":1869,"entry_id":1280,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides","main_title":{"title":"A New Fragment of Parmenides"},"abstract":"The text discusses a disputed line in Parmenides, quoted in Plato's Theaetetus and Simplicius' Physics. Some editors deny the line's independent existence, claiming it was created by Plato by misquoting another verse. The author disagrees with this view, arguing that the line is meaningful and could have been in their texts of Parmenides. The author also argues that there is no reason to believe that Simplicius took the line from Plato, and that Plato was not slovenly in his treatment of Parmenides. The author proposes a corrected version of the line and suggests that it may be Parmenides' last word on the unity and unchangeableness of Being. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/22AiAGR3zgXhXHY","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1280,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Review","volume":"49","issue":"4","pages":"122-123"}},"sort":["A New Fragment of Parmenides"]}

Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9, 1939
By: Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Title Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9
Type Article
Language English
Date 1939
Journal The Classical Quarterly
Volume 33
Issue 1
Pages 34-35
Categories no categories
Author(s) Cornford, Francis Macdonald
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In this passage from Aristotle's De Caelo, he explores why the heavens revolve in one direction rather than the other. He suggests that the universe has a front and a back, which implies a forward motion that is superior to backward motion, just as upward and rightward motions are superior to their respective opposites. Aristotle argues that since nature always follows the best course, the direction of the heaven's revolution must be forward and therefore better. The text is difficult to understand due to possible corruptions, but a comparison with Simplicius' paraphrase suggests that both the subject and object of the main verb are missing and need to be restored. [introduction/conclusion]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1281","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1281,"authors_free":[{"id":1870,"entry_id":1281,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":55,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","free_first_name":"Francis Macdonald","free_last_name":"Cornford","norm_person":{"id":55,"first_name":"Francis Macdonald","last_name":"Cornford","full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118975056","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9"},"abstract":"In this passage from Aristotle's De Caelo, he explores why the heavens revolve in one direction rather than the other. He suggests that the universe has a front and a back, which implies a forward motion that is superior to backward motion, just as upward and rightward motions are superior to their respective opposites. Aristotle argues that since nature always follows the best course, the direction of the heaven's revolution must be forward and therefore better. The text is difficult to understand due to possible corruptions, but a comparison with Simplicius' paraphrase suggests that both the subject and object of the main verb are missing and need to be restored. [introduction\/conclusion]","btype":3,"date":"1939","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/NfJMuZWhRJUPSCS","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":55,"full_name":"Cornford, Francis Macdonald","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1281,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"33","issue":"1","pages":"34-35"}},"sort":["Aristotle De Caelo 288a 2-9"]}

Der Bericht des Simplicius Über die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates, 1907
By: Simplicius, Cilicius, Rudio, Ferdinand (Ed.),
Title Der Bericht des Simplicius Über die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates
Type Monograph
Language German
Date 1907
Publication Place Charleston
Publisher Nabu Press
Categories no categories
Author(s) Simplicius, Cilicius
Editor(s) Rudio, Ferdinand
Translator(s) Rudio, Ferdinand()
Der Bericlit des Simplicius über die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates ist eine der wichtigsten Quellen für die Geschichte der griechischen Geometrie vor Euklid. Enthält doch dieser Bericht, neben vielen anderen historisch höchst wertvollen Mitteilungen, einen umfangreichen wörtlichen Auszug aus der leider verloren gegangenen Geschichte der Geometrie des Eudemus! Das uns auf diese Weise erhaltene Referat des Eudemus bezieht sich auf die scharfsinnigen Untersuchungen, die Hippokrates von Chios etwa ums Jahr 440 v. Chr. in einer ebenfalls verloren gegangenen Abhandlung über die Quadraturen der sogenannten Möndchen angestellt hat, Untersuchungen, die vielleicht als Vorbereitungen zu der von alters her umworbenen Quadratur des Kreises gedient haben. Die Abhandlung des Hippokrates ist um so wertvoller, als sie die älteste auf griechischem Boden entstandene mathematische Arbeit darstellt, die uns in gesicherter und zugleich ausführlicher und zusammenhängender Überlieferung vorliegt. [introduction]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1423","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1423,"authors_free":[{"id":2233,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":62,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Simplicius, Cilicius","free_first_name":"Cilicius","free_last_name":"Simplicius","norm_person":{"id":62,"first_name":"Cilicius","last_name":"Simplicius ","full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118642421","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2234,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":407,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","free_first_name":"Ferdinand","free_last_name":"Rudio","norm_person":{"id":407,"first_name":"Ferdinand","last_name":"Rudio","full_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116670533","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2653,"entry_id":1423,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates","main_title":{"title":"Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates"},"abstract":"Der Bericlit des Simplicius \u00fcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates ist eine der wichtigsten Quellen f\u00fcr die Geschichte der griechischen Geometrie vor Euklid. Enth\u00e4lt doch dieser Bericht, neben vielen anderen historisch h\u00f6chst wertvollen Mitteilungen, einen umfangreichen w\u00f6rtlichen Auszug aus der leider verloren gegangenen Geschichte der Geometrie des Eudemus! Das uns auf diese Weise erhaltene Referat des Eudemus bezieht sich auf die scharfsinnigen Untersuchungen, die Hippokrates von Chios etwa ums Jahr 440 v. Chr. in einer ebenfalls verloren gegangenen Abhandlung \u00fcber die Quadraturen der sogenannten M\u00f6ndchen angestellt hat, Untersuchungen, die vielleicht als Vorbereitungen zu der von alters her umworbenen Quadratur des Kreises gedient haben. Die Abhandlung des Hippokrates ist um so wertvoller, als sie die \u00e4lteste auf griechischem Boden entstandene mathematische Arbeit darstellt, die uns in gesicherter und zugleich ausf\u00fchrlicher und zusammenh\u00e4ngender \u00dcberlieferung vorliegt. [introduction]","btype":1,"date":"1907","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/yrVeMUwJkJZZU4a","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":62,"full_name":"Simplicius Cilicius","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":407,"full_name":"Rudio, Ferdinand","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":1423,"pubplace":"Charleston","publisher":"Nabu Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Der Bericht des Simplicius \u00dcber die Quadraturen des Antiphon und des Hippokrates"]}

Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS⁵ 12 B 1), 1938
By: Dirlmeier, Franz
Title Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS⁵ 12 B 1)
Type Article
Language German
Date 1938
Journal Rheinisches Museum für Philologie
Volume 87
Issue 4
Pages 376-382
Categories no categories
Author(s) Dirlmeier, Franz
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Die Weltsicht der Ionier wird zu einer Zeit, als sie schon 
der Geschichte angehörte, neu geformt durch die Wissenschaft- 
ler der aristotelischen Schule, die somit die uranfängliche Scheu 
vor dem Unbestimmten, Unbegrenzten treu bewahren. Aber 
sie dehnen sie auch noch aus auf fast alle Bereiche des Seins. 
Frühionische Bändigung des  Chaos der -feveffeic in irepioboi 
vollzieht sich aufs neue, wenn etwa Aristoteles den ungeord- 
neten, den nur „gereihten46 Ablauf der Menschenrede „unter- 
wirft", mit der Begründung: die XéHiç elpojiévTi sei ein àr'bkç olà 
tò ÔTreipov tò fàp TéXoç iravreç ßouXovrai K0t6opâv (Rhet. y 9, 
1409 a31). Wenn wir zu den Erkenntnissen der schöpferischen 
Jahrhunderte VI bis III  die sorgsame Auseinandersetzung des 
Simplikios nehmen, der am Ausgang der Antike mit fester Hand 
das  gültig Gedachte noch einmal zusammenfaßt, so  haben 
wir  damit ein  Jahrtausend hellenischen Geistes überblickt. [p. 382]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":757,"authors_free":[{"id":1122,"entry_id":757,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":63,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","free_first_name":"Franz","free_last_name":"Dirlmeier","norm_person":{"id":63,"first_name":"Franz ","last_name":"Dirlmeier","full_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/140255591","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS\u2075 12 B 1)","main_title":{"title":"Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS\u2075 12 B 1)"},"abstract":"Die Weltsicht der Ionier wird zu einer Zeit, als sie schon \r\nder Geschichte angeh\u00f6rte, neu geformt durch die Wissenschaft- \r\nler der aristotelischen Schule, die somit die uranf\u00e4ngliche Scheu \r\nvor dem Unbestimmten, Unbegrenzten treu bewahren. Aber \r\nsie dehnen sie auch noch aus auf fast alle Bereiche des Seins. \r\nFr\u00fchionische B\u00e4ndigung des Chaos der -feveffeic in irepioboi \r\nvollzieht sich aufs neue, wenn etwa Aristoteles den ungeord- \r\nneten, den nur \u201egereihten46 Ablauf der Menschenrede \u201eunter- \r\nwirft\", mit der Begr\u00fcndung: die X\u00e9Hi\u00e7 elpoji\u00e9vTi sei ein \u00e0r'bk\u00e7 ol\u00e0 \r\nt\u00f2 \u00d4Treipov t\u00f2 f\u00e0p T\u00e9Xo\u00e7 iravre\u00e7 \u00dfouXovrai K0t6op\u00e2v (Rhet. y 9, \r\n1409 a31). Wenn wir zu den Erkenntnissen der sch\u00f6pferischen \r\nJahrhunderte VI bis III die sorgsame Auseinandersetzung des \r\nSimplikios nehmen, der am Ausgang der Antike mit fester Hand \r\ndas g\u00fcltig Gedachte noch einmal zusammenfa\u00dft, so haben \r\nwir damit ein Jahrtausend hellenischen Geistes \u00fcberblickt. [p. 382]","btype":3,"date":"1938","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/GvW8g50PoxkFsCo","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":63,"full_name":"Dirlmeier, Franz ","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie","volume":"87","issue":"4","pages":"376-382"}},"sort":["Der Satz des Anaximandros von Milet (VS\u2075 12 B 1)"]}

Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 1903
By: Zeller, Edward
Title Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung
Type Monograph
Language German
Date 1903
Publication Place Leipzig
Publisher Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
Volume 5
Categories no categories
Author(s) Zeller, Edward
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Das erstmals zwischen 1844 und 1852 erschienene Werk ›Die Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung über Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung‹ gilt als eine der monumentalsten philosophischen Studien der Geschichte. In nie wieder erreichter Vollständigkeit und Geschlossenheit beschreibt Eduard Zeller hier den Entwicklungsgang der Philosophie Griechenlands. Als Übersichts- und Grundlagenwerk ist ›Der Zeller‹ auch heute noch von großer Bedeutung. Hervorhebenswert an der Arbeit Eduard Zellers ist vor allem, dass er eine akribische Quellenarbeit mit systematisch-philosophischem Interesse verbindet. Obwohl ein klassischer Gelehrter des 19. Jahrhunderts, philosophiert er in modernem wissenschaftlichen Sinne. Zeller, der den Begriff ›Erkenntnistheorie‹ überhaupt erst in die philosophische Diskussion eingeführt hat, hat mit der ›Philosophie der Griechen‹ ein Werk geschaffen, dessen Bedeutung auch im 21. Jahrhundert unbestritten ist. [offical abstract]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"207","_score":null,"_source":{"id":207,"authors_free":[{"id":264,"entry_id":207,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":413,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zeller, Edward","free_first_name":"Edward","free_last_name":"Zeller","norm_person":{"id":413,"first_name":"Eduard","last_name":"Zeller,","full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118636383","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung","main_title":{"title":"Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung"},"abstract":"Das erstmals zwischen 1844 und 1852 erschienene Werk \u203aDie Philosophie der Griechen. Eine Untersuchung \u00fcber Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung\u2039 gilt als eine der monumentalsten philosophischen Studien der Geschichte. In nie wieder erreichter Vollst\u00e4ndigkeit und Geschlossenheit beschreibt Eduard Zeller hier den Entwicklungsgang der Philosophie Griechenlands. Als \u00dcbersichts- und Grundlagenwerk ist \u203aDer Zeller\u2039 auch heute noch von gro\u00dfer Bedeutung. Hervorhebenswert an der Arbeit Eduard Zellers ist vor allem, dass er eine akribische Quellenarbeit mit systematisch-philosophischem Interesse verbindet. Obwohl ein klassischer Gelehrter des 19. Jahrhunderts, philosophiert er in modernem wissenschaftlichen Sinne. Zeller, der den Begriff \u203aErkenntnistheorie\u2039 \u00fcberhaupt erst in die philosophische Diskussion eingef\u00fchrt hat, hat mit der \u203aPhilosophie der Griechen\u2039 ein Werk geschaffen, dessen Bedeutung auch im 21. Jahrhundert unbestritten ist. [offical abstract]","btype":1,"date":"1903","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/QvrnUKEDOeylIfD","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":413,"full_name":"Zeller, Eduard","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":{"id":207,"pubplace":"Leipzig","publisher":"Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft","series":"","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung"]}

Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios, 1935
By: Merlan, Philipp
Title Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios
Type Article
Language German
Date 1935
Journal Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Neue Folge
Volume 84
Issue 2
Pages 154-160
Categories no categories
Author(s) Merlan, Philipp
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
In diesem Text geht es um Simplikios' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' De caelo II, 1, 284 a 14 ff. und Pseudo-Alexandros' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' Metaphysik A, 8, 1074aff. Beide diskutieren Fragen zur Bewegung des Himmels und stellen ähnliche Gedanken zum Verhältnis von Seele und Bewegung dar. Der Text betrachtet die Möglichkeit, dass Simplikios und Pseudo-Alexandros einander zitiert haben oder dass sie beide den echten Alexandros zitieren. Es wird auch auf die Interpretation von Aristoteles' De caelo H, 1,284a 27 ff. durch Simplikios eingegangen. [whole text]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1209","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1209,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1209,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":258,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Merlan, Philipp","free_first_name":"Philipp","free_last_name":"Merlan","norm_person":{"id":258,"first_name":"Philip","last_name":"Merlan","full_name":"Merlan, Philip","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/128860502","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios","main_title":{"title":"Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios"},"abstract":"In diesem Text geht es um Simplikios' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' De caelo II, 1, 284 a 14 ff. und Pseudo-Alexandros' Kommentar zu Aristoteles' Metaphysik A, 8, 1074aff. Beide diskutieren Fragen zur Bewegung des Himmels und stellen \u00e4hnliche Gedanken zum Verh\u00e4ltnis von Seele und Bewegung dar. Der Text betrachtet die M\u00f6glichkeit, dass Simplikios und Pseudo-Alexandros einander zitiert haben oder dass sie beide den echten Alexandros zitieren. Es wird auch auf die Interpretation von Aristoteles' De caelo H, 1,284a 27 ff. durch Simplikios eingegangen. [whole text]","btype":3,"date":"1935","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/7lVxYR3sHQ2Ie0a","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":258,"full_name":"Merlan, Philip","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1209,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rheinisches Museum f\u00fcr Philologie. Neue Folge","volume":"84","issue":"2","pages":"154-160"}},"sort":["Ein Simplikios-Zitat bei Pseudo-Alexandros und ein Plotinos-Zitat bei Simplikios"]}

Genethliakon, 1910
By: Robert, Carl (Ed.)
Title Genethliakon
Type Edited Book
Language German
Date 1910
Publication Place Berlin
Publisher Weidmannsche Buchhandlung
Categories no categories
Author(s)
Editor(s) Robert, Carl
Translator(s)
Sammelband mit Aufsätzen zu verschiedenen Themen, Carl Robert von seinen ehemaligen Schülern zu dessem sechzigsten Geburtstag gewidmet.

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"307","_score":null,"_source":{"id":307,"authors_free":[{"id":385,"entry_id":307,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":294,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Robert, Carl","free_first_name":"Carl","free_last_name":"Robert","norm_person":{"id":294,"first_name":"Carl","last_name":"Robert","full_name":"Robert, Carl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116575956","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Genethliakon","main_title":{"title":"Genethliakon"},"abstract":"Sammelband mit Aufs\u00e4tzen zu verschiedenen Themen, Carl Robert von seinen ehemaligen Sch\u00fclern zu dessem sechzigsten Geburtstag gewidmet.","btype":4,"date":"1910","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/dNT1HXFCgRr5Yap","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":294,"full_name":"Robert, Carl","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":{"id":307,"pubplace":"Berlin","publisher":"Weidmannsche Buchhandlung","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Genethliakon"]}

Indivisible Lines, 1936
By: Nicol, A. T.
Title Indivisible Lines
Type Article
Language English
Date 1936
Journal The Classical Quarterly
Volume 30
Issue 2
Pages 120-126
Categories no categories
Author(s) Nicol, A. T.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The name  of  Democritus  can  claim  a  place  in  any discussion  of  indivisibles. 
Yet  its introduction in  this  paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle ; 
for Democritus did not believe  in the  existence  of  indivisible  lines. Nowhere  is  the 
belief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the  scholion on 
De  Caelo 268a  x, which  says  he  made  his  elements  indivisible  solids,  as  contrasted 
with  lines or surfaces. Two  passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will  show why  he could not believe in indivisible lines. [p. 120]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"866","_score":null,"_source":{"id":866,"authors_free":[{"id":1270,"entry_id":866,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":278,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nicol, A. T.","free_first_name":"A. T.","free_last_name":"Nicol","norm_person":{"id":278,"first_name":"Nicol","last_name":"A. T.","full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Indivisible Lines","main_title":{"title":"Indivisible Lines"},"abstract":"The name of Democritus can claim a place in any discussion of indivisibles. \r\nYet its introduction in this paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle ; \r\nfor Democritus did not believe in the existence of indivisible lines. Nowhere is the \r\nbelief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the scholion on \r\nDe Caelo 268a x, which says he made his elements indivisible solids, as contrasted \r\nwith lines or surfaces. Two passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will show why he could not believe in indivisible lines. [p. 120]","btype":3,"date":"1936","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/j7CSmqxKwIBye6i","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":278,"full_name":"Nicol, A. T.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":866,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":"30","issue":"2","pages":"120-126"}},"sort":["Indivisible Lines"]}

Ioannes Philoponus, 1917
By: Gudeman, Alfred, Kroll, Wilhelm (Ed.)
Title Ioannes Philoponus
Type Book Section
Language German
Date 1917
Published in Paulys Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neunter Band Hyaia — Iugum
Pages 1768-1795
Categories no categories
Author(s) Gudeman, Alfred
Editor(s) Kroll, Wilhelm
Translator(s)

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1525","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1525,"authors_free":[{"id":2650,"entry_id":1525,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":566,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gudeman, Alfred","free_first_name":"Alfred","free_last_name":"Gudeman","norm_person":{"id":566,"first_name":"Alfred","last_name":"Gudeman","full_name":"Gudeman, Alfred","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/102810761","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":2651,"entry_id":1525,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":300,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","free_first_name":"Wilhelm","free_last_name":"Kroll","norm_person":{"id":300,"first_name":"Wilhelm","last_name":"Kroll","full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116552581","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Ioannes Philoponus","main_title":{"title":"Ioannes Philoponus"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"1917","language":"German","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/szrAc2uDYBkJaW9","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":566,"full_name":"Gudeman, Alfred","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}},{"id":300,"full_name":"Kroll, Wilhelm","role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"}}],"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1525,"section_of":1526,"pages":"1768-1795","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1526,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"de","title":"Paulys Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neunter Band Hyaia \u2014 Iugum","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"1916","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/DT7g7hn04BY8jPG","translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":1526,"pubplace":"Stuttgart","publisher":"Metzler","series":"Paulys Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft","volume":"9","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Ioannes Philoponus"]}

Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius, 1950
By: Allan, Donald J.
Title Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius
Type Article
Language English
Date 1950
Journal Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies
Volume 2
Pages 82–120
Categories no categories
Author(s) Allan, Donald J.
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
The main  problem  with  which  we  shall  be  concerned  is  that  of the 
authorship  of the versions  of  de  Caelo  from the  Greek  which  made 
their  appearance  during  the  thirteenth  century.  But  it  will  be  beSt 
to begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers 
concerning  the  Arabic-latin  versions  in  which  this  treatise  to t  became 
known  in  the lands  o f Western  Europe. [p 82]

{"_index":"sire","_type":"_doc","_id":"1013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1013,"authors_free":[{"id":1529,"entry_id":1013,"agent_type":null,"is_normalised":null,"person_id":32,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Allan, Donald J.","free_first_name":"Donald J.","free_last_name":"Allan","norm_person":{"id":32,"first_name":"Donald J.","last_name":"Allan","full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1158470029","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}],"entry_title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius","main_title":{"title":"Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"},"abstract":"The main problem with which we shall be concerned is that of the \r\nauthorship of the versions of de Caelo from the Greek which made \r\ntheir appearance during the thirteenth century. But it will be beSt \r\nto begin with a recapitulation o f the fads ascertained by previous writers \r\nconcerning the Arabic-latin versions in which this treatise to t became \r\nknown in the lands o f Western Europe. [p 82]","btype":3,"date":"1950","language":"English","online_url":"","online_resources":"https:\/\/uni-koeln.sciebo.de\/s\/0PjZnKu9FMvQiNF","doi_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":32,"full_name":"Allan, Donald J.","role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"}}],"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies","volume":"2","issue":"","pages":"82\u2013120"}},"sort":["Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and of the Commentary of Simplicius"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 3